Post History
I'm midway through a Masters in Creative Writing. My tutor recently told me (something like): each character deserves a chance to be liked by the reader. I didn't want people to like the particula...
Question
character-development
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/36401 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I'm midway through a Masters in Creative Writing. My tutor recently told me (something like): each character deserves a chance to be liked by the reader. I didn't want people to like the particular character I was working on and so it got me to wondering about the circumstances around thoroughly despicable characters. When I think about it, I don't even know if it's _advisable_ to write such a character. I mean, it seems to be that there are always extenuating circumstances and excuses and evil-happenings-in-childhood that can make the character someone a reader can sympathise with - no matter what the character does. But still, I'd like to write an irredeemable character. So, under what circumstances is it okay to write a thoroughly despicable character with no redeemable qualities? Just to clarify - I don't need to know _how_ to write complete monsters because I can do that already. What I'm asking is _when is it okay_ to write a complete monster in terms of producing a story that will get a good reaction from readers.