Post History
I'm assuming here that you mean you've got your own footnotes, but some of the citations from the original work contain their own footnotes from that work. If this is the case, the first question ...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2504 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I'm assuming here that you mean you've got your own footnotes, but some of the citations from the original work contain their own footnotes from that work. If this is the case, the first question to ask is: do you need the original footnote? If not, then remove it. If you do need it, then I would suggest you make it your own footnote by doing something like this: 1. Title of the article uses « novamente», while in the journal’s table of contents — « nuovamente» 2. Shakespeare noted "That is the question". Personally, I would use footnotes very sparingly, if at all. They can be very annoying and make your text difficult to read. In the majority of cases, turning footnotes into endnotes works much better. **Edit:** Another possible solution you could try is to just include the original footnote verbatim, and then include a reference at the end to demonstrate it's from the original work. Example: 1. "That is the question." (A. N. Author, 2000, pg. 150)