Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A How to control safety nets in discovery writing

As a discovery writer, I echo the sentiment that I absolutely control the direction of the story. I personally write with an end in mind; which I record as notes (not prose) about what finally hap...

posted 6y ago by Amadeus‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Canina‭

Answer
#5: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-05-20T19:01:38Z (over 3 years ago)
  • As a discovery writer, I echo Michael's comment, I absolutely control the direction of the story.
  • I personally write with an end in mind; which I record as notes (not prose) about what finally happens; what is revealed, etc.
  • I very much do give my characters personalities and proclivities; while writing I feel like they are real people I know, and will only write for them actions, dialogue and ideas consistent with their personality. So, for an extreme example to illustrate my point, I am not going to force my virgin sidekick to volunteer to seduce a guard because that would be a convenient distraction. My devout priest isn't cutting any throats.
  • But giving my characters loose reins doesn't make me obligated to follow every move that occurs to them. I aim for their most plausible (or most conflict-producing) response, but even us real people have a handful of plausible responses to deploy in most situations. We do it, we don't do it, we find a safer way, we find a more dangerous way because we are impatient. We get angry, or get angry and control ourselves. We act on our love, or hide it with nonchalance, or hide it and suffer because it is doomed or wrong or breaks a vow.
  • I don't mind detours, but if I as an author am much attracted to a great idea I had whilst writing a scene, I have a rule: If that makes my current notion of the ending no longer viable, I must come up with a **_better_** ending, or think harder and rewrite the scene in some other manner to preserve my current **_better_** ending. I have to choose from a different but plausible reaction for my character(s). If that seems impossible, and I've written myself into a corner, then I unwind more of the story until I am no longer in a corner.
  • When I am in a corner it is not that there is NO ending if I keep writing, it is that I won't know the ending or I know it won't be good; e.g. I write reasonably happy endings. I will note that Stephen King is a discovery writer that does the same thing; while writing _The Stand_ he said he discarded months of work because he wrote himself into a corner.
  • I control the story. I know good stories will fit pretty well into the three act structure and their timing points; that is something I expect to see emerge as I am writing; another compass to keep me on path. Unlike plotters I don't plan these ahead of time; but the three act structure was derived by analyzing a lot of pre-existing successful stories and taking averages; it _describes_ what successful storytellers were doing _naturally,_ by instinct and experience. So I have a "feel" for how long my hero needs to show us her normal world, when she needs to be ejected from it, when it is time for her path to change and something new to happen.
  • If you don't have a feel for that yet; read up on the three act structure and where the inflection points are.
  • As a discovery writer, I echo the sentiment that I absolutely control the direction of the story.
  • I personally write with an end in mind; which I record as notes (not prose) about what finally happens; what is revealed, etc.
  • I very much do give my characters personalities and proclivities; while writing I feel like they are real people I know, and will only write for them actions, dialogue and ideas consistent with their personality. So, for an extreme example to illustrate my point, I am not going to force my virgin sidekick to volunteer to seduce a guard because that would be a convenient distraction. My devout priest isn't cutting any throats.
  • But giving my characters loose reins doesn't make me obligated to follow every move that occurs to them. I aim for their most plausible (or most conflict-producing) response, but even us real people have a handful of plausible responses to deploy in most situations. We do it, we don't do it, we find a safer way, we find a more dangerous way because we are impatient. We get angry, or get angry and control ourselves. We act on our love, or hide it with nonchalance, or hide it and suffer because it is doomed or wrong or breaks a vow.
  • I don't mind detours, but if I as an author am much attracted to a great idea I had whilst writing a scene, I have a rule: If that makes my current notion of the ending no longer viable, I must come up with a **_better_** ending, or think harder and rewrite the scene in some other manner to preserve my current **_better_** ending. I have to choose from a different but plausible reaction for my character(s). If that seems impossible, and I've written myself into a corner, then I unwind more of the story until I am no longer in a corner.
  • When I am in a corner it is not that there is NO ending if I keep writing, it is that I won't know the ending or I know it won't be good; e.g. I write reasonably happy endings. I will note that Stephen King is a discovery writer that does the same thing; while writing _The Stand_ he said he discarded months of work because he wrote himself into a corner.
  • I control the story. I know good stories will fit pretty well into the three act structure and their timing points; that is something I expect to see emerge as I am writing; another compass to keep me on path. Unlike plotters I don't plan these ahead of time; but the three act structure was derived by analyzing a lot of pre-existing successful stories and taking averages; it _describes_ what successful storytellers were doing _naturally,_ by instinct and experience. So I have a "feel" for how long my hero needs to show us her normal world, when she needs to be ejected from it, when it is time for her path to change and something new to happen.
  • If you don't have a feel for that yet; read up on the three act structure and where the inflection points are.
#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-19T22:13:27Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/37054
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T09:10:14Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/37054
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T09:10:14Z (about 5 years ago)
As a discovery writer, I echo Michael's comment, I absolutely control the direction of the story.

I personally write with an end in mind; which I record as notes (not prose) about what finally happens; what is revealed, etc.

I very much do give my characters personalities and proclivities; while writing I feel like they are real people I know, and will only write for them actions, dialogue and ideas consistent with their personality. So, for an extreme example to illustrate my point, I am not going to force my virgin sidekick to volunteer to seduce a guard because that would be a convenient distraction. My devout priest isn't cutting any throats.

But giving my characters loose reins doesn't make me obligated to follow every move that occurs to them. I aim for their most plausible (or most conflict-producing) response, but even us real people have a handful of plausible responses to deploy in most situations. We do it, we don't do it, we find a safer way, we find a more dangerous way because we are impatient. We get angry, or get angry and control ourselves. We act on our love, or hide it with nonchalance, or hide it and suffer because it is doomed or wrong or breaks a vow.

I don't mind detours, but if I as an author am much attracted to a great idea I had whilst writing a scene, I have a rule: If that makes my current notion of the ending no longer viable, I must come up with a **_better_** ending, or think harder and rewrite the scene in some other manner to preserve my current **_better_** ending. I have to choose from a different but plausible reaction for my character(s). If that seems impossible, and I've written myself into a corner, then I unwind more of the story until I am no longer in a corner.

When I am in a corner it is not that there is NO ending if I keep writing, it is that I won't know the ending or I know it won't be good; e.g. I write reasonably happy endings. I will note that Stephen King is a discovery writer that does the same thing; while writing _The Stand_ he said he discarded months of work because he wrote himself into a corner.

I control the story. I know good stories will fit pretty well into the three act structure and their timing points; that is something I expect to see emerge as I am writing; another compass to keep me on path. Unlike plotters I don't plan these ahead of time; but the three act structure was derived by analyzing a lot of pre-existing successful stories and taking averages; it _describes_ what successful storytellers were doing _naturally,_ by instinct and experience. So I have a "feel" for how long my hero needs to show us her normal world, when she needs to be ejected from it, when it is time for her path to change and something new to happen.

If you don't have a feel for that yet; read up on the three act structure and where the inflection points are.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2018-06-19T14:53:13Z (over 6 years ago)
Original score: 6