Can a mystery novel have more than one mystery in it? And does it have to be a "who dunnit" concept?
I am writing a novel and it goes something like this: In the first half of the novel, the protagonist knows who is doing the killing, but they are trying to make sense of it as in "how are they doing it?" and "why are they doing it?" In the second half of the novel, the protagonist finds out there's an object that can stop the killing altogether, so the main question is "where is the object?"
Would this story classify as a mystery?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/37876. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
2 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Most mysteries don't exist in isolation, but rather they are manifold, take one of my favourites, Roanoke, there are several mysteries within the mystery of the Roanoke disaster:
where did the colonists try to go?
where did they actually end up?
when did they leave?
and most "interestingly" what on Earth does "CROATOAN" mean?
So multiple related mysteries certainly have a place in a single piece.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/37879. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
As long as both mysteries are resolved, I don't see a problem with it.
+1 Ash for Columbo. Also, there was recently some miniseries on TV about a woman, a young mother. In the opening, she inexplicably attacks a man and murders him in front of many people. The mystery is not who did it, or how to prove it, but why: Even she does not know why she did it, and has no motive.
I did not watch it (short on time for other professional reasons), but it is an interesting premise.
So yes, investigating "how and why" can be interesting, and once "how and why" is figured out, investigating how to stop it can be the rest of the story.
Yes, that can still be called a mystery. Much of the motive in investigating any murder is punishment, but a healthy part is also to get a danger to society in jail, in order to prevent future murders. Presumably the first murder is the one they hesitated on the most. This is just a logical extension of that same motive for the investigator.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads