Post History
+1 Arcanist Lupus for doing the research I was thinking of doing! I agree your novel is probably not too long and can get published. But I also believe it would be easier to attract agents if it ...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/38116 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/38116 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
+1 Arcanist Lupus for doing the research I was thinking of doing! I agree your novel is probably not too long and can get published. But I also believe it would be easier to attract agents if it were somewhat shorter. So I will add different advice than just answering the question. Namely, go through your novel, scene by scene. A scene is an unbroken span of time, basically, any mix of prose and dialogue, even if the setting is changing as things transpire (as it might if walking or traveling). When you have a time-jump you start a new scene, even if it is in the same space. A time jump can be a prose summarization of time passage (_They walked in silence for an hour,_ or _The following day,_), or when turn the camera off to let something happen, like a sex scene, or burying a body, or getting from the apartment in Oklahoma City to the hotel in Paris. Scene by scene, justify why the scene is in there, and specifically what _later_ part of the story would be diminished or not make sense if this scene were just deleted. Why is it there? Can its _raison d'être_ be accomplished in fewer words? Is it _already_ accomplished in another scene, earlier or later? If so, why must it be accomplished twice? Which one does it better? First time authors have a tendency to want to hammer on things that if done too often becomes tiresome and repetitive. _My hero is smart! Here's ten prior instances proving she's smart!_ **Oh my god she's _SO_ smart.** I'm not saying you've done that, but this tendency to try and crush it by repetition is a real thing, so you want to look for that. Another tendency of first time authors that will turn off agents and publishers is to include "soapbox" scenes that are not necessary to the story at all, and justify them as "character building" or "world building". Soapboxing is also called pulpit pounding, speechifying, etc. The soapbox scene is used to promote some moral, political, philosophical or even pseudo-science viewpoint the author wants to "get out there", thinking nobody will care if there are few pages of that. Or a few dozen of them scattered discreetly throughout the book. Both character building and world building _should_ be necessary to the story. Soapbox scenes bog down the story, the action and the plot, and there's a good chance you will be asked to cut them. Authors often see these as their darlings, publishers (and movie producers) see them as turn-offs and sand in the gears. These guys are there to make money **_entertaining_** people, not popping them out of their reading / viewing reverie to argue philosophy or politics or religion. So look for those; as you go through your scenes if you justify the scene as "character building" or "world building", ask yourself if those character or setting details really have any significant **consequences** later in the book. If they do not, and you love them anyway, you are probably soapboxing. If they do, and you could convey them in a third of the word count, you are probably also soapboxing a bit.