Post History
I'm not sure whether or not this is standard practice, but I've been taught that between two different-level headings, there shouldn't be any text. For example, the following would not be permitted...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T09:45:54Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/38752 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
PixelMaster
·
2019-12-08T09:45:54Z (about 5 years ago)
I'm not sure whether or not this is standard practice, but I've been taught that between two different-level headings, there shouldn't be any text. For example, the following would not be permitted (or is at least considered bad practice): > # 1. Chapter > > blah _← no text here_ > > ### 1.1. Subchapter ## Following this convention, should all text be at the same structuring depth? I.e. all text would be for example at X.Y.Z. level, and no text at A.B. level. Visualization: > # 1. Chapter > > blah _← no text here (depth=1), because chapter 2 has text at depth=2_ > > # 2. Chapter > > ### 2.1 Subchapter > > blah <sub>Note: I'm aware that chapters aren't supposed to stand alone (i.e. if there's chapter 1.1, there has to be at least a 1.2), but I omitted those for the sake of readability.</sub>
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2018-09-07T09:50:57Z (over 6 years ago)
Original score: 2