Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is it reasonable to have weary character climb rope to safety? [closed]

+0
−0

Closed by System‭ on Nov 16, 2018 at 16:31

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

My MC, injured (having been shot earlier) is extremely tired after carrying his partner, who took a bullet for him, towards safety.

She suspects that the ex-fil location they are heading towards might be compromised. Their adversaries are very clever and competent, so it is well within the field of possibility.

There is danger behind them as the hunt is on, danger ahead too. A safe place a quarter mile away is possible, but not without rest.

There is a hunting blind nearby with a ladder and a rope. 25 feet up is safer than on the ground as the search will surely find them there, but the adversaries need not think they went to ground by going up due to his injury.

My question is, considering he is extremely tired, is it credible to have him climb that rope which is the nearest path to safety?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/40182. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

You are better off with the ladder; it is easy to climb a ladder using only one good leg, if your arms are functional. The other leg can be completely broken. Just use your hands and arms to hold up ALL your weight while you move the good leg to the next step, dragging the injured leg without any pressure, until you are inside.

You best pull the ladder up after you, any person-hunter that doesn't investigate a ladder leading to a treehouse as a potential hiding place has a brain injury.

If you want to get rid of the ladder and use just a rope, Don't use the Gym class method, use the Navy Seal Brake and Squat BUD/s [Basic Underwater Demolition / Seals] method shown on this site. There is a 3:52 video at the bottom of the blog post; the BUD/s Brake and Squat starts at 2:00, and the soldier there climbs about 30 feet. How To Climb A Rope Like A Navy Seal.

The thing to note here is that all the body weight is supported on one good leg and the two arms; the bad leg probably can't be broken here, it is used but no serious pressure is put on it. Since your injured man can cross terrain, I presume his leg is not actually shattered.

For those that cannot see the video; the BUD/s method is illustrated below; it comes from that site and is from ITS Tactical. In this picture all the weight is on the arms and climber's right leg. The rope travels under the right boot then over the left boot, which acts as a brake so the climber doesn't slip down the rope. The "squat" part of this is to support the body completely with the arms, pull the legs up into a squat, then step on the rope and bring the hands higher on it.

Brake And Squat BUD/s Style

For a thinner rope, it is possible to do something similar wrapping it around the good leg a few times. It is much more awkward but doable. If the left leg is really bad, imagine taking that loop over the left boot, and bringing it up into the left hand. Then you can hang on to the rope with your right hand, pick your right foot up about a foot or two, tighten the rope underneath it with your left hand and stand, scooting your hands on the ropes. It is also awkward, but it can work.

Like the ladder, pull the rope up behind you.

In general, if the blind is not very well camouflaged, their adversaries are just not going to be fooled. I think you are making them too stupid; they aren't deer, and they probably don't know exactly how bad their prey is injured, or whether the guy can climb to save his life. The adversaries are going to put some bullets into that blind if they see it, not just turn their back on it and say "Oh well, they vanished."

If possible, I'd use the blind as a blind, and if the adversaries approach, shoot to kill. Or use it as a lure: Station your men in cover on the ground, so when the adversaries find the blind, and shoot it up, and climb to investigate it, they are ambushed by sniper fire from the ground in a crossfire. You get more weapons and ammo.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads