Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How should you use sexually deviant monsters in fantasy?

+0
−0

terror is a real and powerful thing. A monster is ever-so-slightly scarier if it violates you in some way. there have been many of these types of creatures seen in myths and fairy tales. This goes beyond the cliche succubus concept, and includes monsters such as the liderc and the pobobawa. Many of these monsters are far more terrifying in origin myths, and a call to remain steadfast in society's values and traditions. Whether it's warning against sex with loose men or women, or cautioning against the spread of diseases, there is often a morality tale behind them.

These kind of creatures are sometimes used today with various results. Manga like Berserk or warhammer go out of their way to show the gritty details and get very visual. Since sexual assault is a serious and sensitive issue in today's world, how should these creatures be portrayed? Should they be used to add shock value or add to the grimdarkiness of a world? Should they be portrayed differently ?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/40213. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

So much of this depends on your ability as a writer. In the hands of one author, a monster like this could enhance the story, with a different author, it could cause people to throw the book across the room. The idea, in and of itself, can work, but it's tricky.

What I think makes the biggest difference is the underlying morality tale. Sure, they're for both men and women, but in different ways.

For men, it's about being careful who you choose as a sexual partner, because women can steal your power or are monsters in disguise or will drag you down.

But for women, the message is, don't have sexual urges at all. Don't disobey your father or husband. And don't spend any time with outside men. A man might be in danger from a monster, but a women is no longer worthy of protection from monsters if she "strays."

Even the most modern works often draw on these reservoirs of sexism. And authors who write about periods or invented worlds where such sexism was indeed rampant, will fall into the trap of believing they must mirror it (racism gets the same treatment, but those are different sorts of monsters).

So decide what your underlying message is. Do you want a monster that reinforces it? Or one that reinforces the prevailing morality that your characters chafe against? Does your monster punish those who freely enter into sexual relationships or perhaps is it a monster who punishes those who violate consent?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

Deviant in reproduction

One of the better uses of a deviant monster is in Alien. A male crew member is "impregnated" orally. The resulting baby is described as something that "shouldn't exist", grows full-sized in hours, has acid for blood, etc. The monster is deviant from conception and defies all of nature's laws.

The sexual violation is all metaphor – if you don't recognize the rape subtext you can still empathize with the body anxiety and Kane's vulnerability. If you do recognize the subtext your sense of dread is elevated and the setup pays off.

Deviant in pleasure

The Cenobites from Hellraiser are expected to be beautiful women who are skilled in the sexy arts, but turn out to be sadomasochistic flesh monsters that want to peal off your skin. Their sexual deviancy is a promise that is taken to the unwelcome extreme.

Both blur sexual imagery and universal body anxiety. The first victims are male, making them instantly scarier and stronger. Arguably, the body violation would not have the same impact if the monsters were selectively hetero-normalized.

Actually just sex, but unpleasant and one-sided

As Kirk so wonderfully said in his answer "If you write without reason, it will show."

I'll paraphrase: if your monsters are just a thinly disguised sexploitation fantasy, no one will be fooled into thinking it is something dark and angsty.

Monsters of the flesh have to be monsters of the mind too. If the idea scares/threatens/violates you personally it is worth exploring. If it is there just to shock and titillate with power fantasies against "empty skirts", it will deservingly get eyerolls from anyone who doesn't share that fantasy, and sees it as a Mars Needs Women trope.

Worst case scenario the rape-y space slug scene backfires and becomes a legendary bad joke.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/40224. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »