Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Different ways to emphasize

+1
−0

My previous question was "Are paragraph spacing used for emphasis?" and that got me thinking even deeper about emphasizing.

I'd like to emphasize to create tension and make the reader continue reading. I'm writing a first page, and to do so (in my opinion) I want the reader to question the last part, and I want to emphasize that part.

I'd like to open my horizons a bit and (hopefully) discover some other ways to emphasize? Are there any other ways to emphasize paragraphs and sentences, other than changing the text itself (underline, bolding, etc) and adding spacing? Are there any benefits of each one?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

The best writing is one that uses typographic markup sparingly. There are some agents and publishers who prefer manuscripts to be submitted in plain text! If your writing relies on italics, boldface, and a certain page layout, it won't work for those publishers.

The reason for publishers to demand plain text submissions is that the absence of markup is usually a sign of quality. A skillful writer can emphasize through their writing alone and doesn't need markup to do so. Consider the following examples:

I came home yesterday.

Yesterday, I came home. (emphasis on "yesterday")

I came home. Yesterday. Not on Sunday, as my wife expected. (even stronger emphasis on "yesterday")

Or these:

He walked down the road.

He ambled down the road. (emphasis through a less common word)

Slowly, placing his feet carefully, he quietly crept along the sidewalk towards the glowing red light. (emphasis through detail)

There are many other ways to put focus or emphasis on certain parts of your story. What I'd suggest is that you play with your passage, rephrase and reorder the words, sentences, even paragraphs, until your readers are led through your story in the way that you want.

If you have done that, and still feel that you need to emphasize a certain word, use italics. All other markup is unconventional and, in literary fiction, bad style. To me, boldface, all caps, underlined text, or changing font faces in fiction are a sure sign of a bad writer.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/40922. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »