Post History
In scientific academic settings, the original article should be preferred, read and cited, and an effort should be made to do so. It is however acceptable to refer to a more recent one under certai...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-18T21:34:22Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/41506 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T10:39:50Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/41506 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
In scientific academic settings, the original article should be preferred, read and cited, and an effort should be made to do so. It is however acceptable to refer to a more recent one under certain circumstances. For instance, you may cite the recent article if: - the recent article offers a complete analysis of the idea you refer to. It is still fine if the idea originated elsewhere but the authors provide an extensive analysis. - you have no way to verify the content of the older article, e.g. If it is written in a language you don't understand - the recent article is a review and discusses many articles that are relevant to your work. To cite as "for a review on the topic see X" Note that you don't need to justify your choice. If you're writing an article, you may be requested by the reviewers to add references.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-01-22T17:58:18Z (almost 6 years ago)
Original score: 2