Writing a trilogy and editing [closed]
Closed by System on Feb 20, 2019 at 11:34
This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.
I planned out to write a trilogy and the first draft of book one is now completed. I want to know if I should edit this draft before starting on the second book.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/42196. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
In my opinion, you should.
It's a good thing to plan ahead for sequels, but a first draft is not a finished book.
There are at least two reasons that I can see to edit before going forward:
You may want to start sending your book one to an editor. In that case, it's way better to get out of the way any error, at least, the most amateurish ones. Don't get me wrong - drafts will always have errors (even simple typos) but the first one is particularly vulnerable. You may want to be sure that there is no major issue in the structure of the story, in character development, no inconsistencies in the plot and so on. Also, it would be nice to rework your introduction to "hook in" any potential reader.
Before you continue with book two, you may want to be sure that you have solid ground to build upon. Even if now you may have the impression that book one is perfect, this is not always the case. Make sure that book one is "solid" in terms of plot and characters, and that it stands on its legs without any major issue. It's better to rewrite some chapters now rather than risking to rework an entire trilogy from the start (as small the risk might be).
0 comment threads
Write at least part of your second book before editing your first.
I'm going to take a slightly different slant than most of the other contributors and suggest that you write about half of your second book before you go back and do a serious rewrite of the first.
The reason? Because almost inevitably, as you start writing your second book, you'll realize that you need or want to make some changes to your previous book. You'll realize that you want to include a little bit more foreshadowing at the end of book one to set up the plot for book two; or you'll want to change the result of a scene or even an entire arc. You might find that the scene in which the trusted sidekick sacrifices his life for the hero should come at the climax of the second book rather than the first. Or that your villain, who was setting up Plan A at the end of the first book, should really be setting up Plan B instead, because the first half of the second book needs to deal with Plan B, saving Plan A for later. You might find halfway through the second book that you don't really have three books of material, only two and a half, so you'll need to rewrite significant chunks of the first book for your final opus to fit into an whole number of books.
If you go back and do your serious editing now, you'll almost invariably find that a lot of your fine-tuning gets wasted. Even worse, you might not be willing to make the necessary changes because you've already spent so much time perfecting those scenes that cutting them is just too painful.
To avoid this extra work (and unnecessary pain), I suggest writing more than just the first book before doing an editing sweep. Personally I find that I almost never want to go back and change events that happened more than half a book ago; hence my recommendation of writing half the second book before editing the first, but you might find that a quarter or a third is sufficient for your purposes. Once the second book is well underway -- once you don't just suspect but actively know that you won't need to make significant changes -- then is the time to prepare the first book for publication.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/42214. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
Trilogies are rarely, if ever, published back-to-back. Instead, first one book is published, then, if it is successful, the second one, then the third.
What this means is, when you query an agent, you have Book 1 finished to a T (as you would with a stand-alone book, when querying an agent). You also mention that you already have books 2 and 3 of the trilogy outlined. ("Outlined" is a flexible term, but since you're planning it to be a trilogy, you definitely should have something - you can't just realise mid-way that things aren't working and you'd need to scrape the whole thing.) Since querying an agent takes a lot of time, you will be making progress on Book 2 while attempting to get Book 1 published.
Why mention that Books 2 and 3 are already in progress, when you're only querying with Book 1? Because you intent to write a trilogy, so the agent would need to know that this intention is not an amorphous sort of intention, but an "already started working" intention. From the experience of now successful writer Jim Butcher:
[editor] was wavering until she heard that I had three books already finished, and then she was a lot more interested. (source)
(To clarify, Jim started querying agents when he had only the one manuscript. In the time it took him to find an agent willing to represent him, he had finished two more, and had the outline for several more to come.)
So, since you need to have Book 1 finished to a T in order to start querying agents, edit it now, start writing the second book after you're completely 100% finished with the first.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads