How to know you are over-explaining and oversimplifying a subject?
Recently, I started writing articles about different subjects I learn on my own (programming, logic ...etc).
While writing, I have this tendency to overexplain, I know that readers are smart, but I still think that there is room for misunderstanding, so I tend to repeat myself and oversimplify things unconsciously.
Is is just a feeling? how do I know if I am over-simplifying and over-explaining the material?
Edit
This is an example :
The first argument is a Deductive Argument, in that it has Premise 1, Premise 2, and a conclusion .. And we may also consider it an Inductive Argument, in that we can verify Premise 1 and 2 inductivly, by means of observation, to determine whether Socrates has a beard, or whether all Greeks have beards, and to conclude whether the conclusion is probably true or false.
So, to some extent, we can consider some Deductive Arguments to be also Inductive Arguments. You can think of our argument this way inductively :
Premise 1: Socrates is a Greek (Inductively Probably True, because most records and accounts about Socrates refer to him as a Greek, and his name is a Greek name).
Premise 2: All Greeks have beards. (Inductively False, because many Greeks today apparently do not have beards, and many statues of ancient Greeks have no beards, therefore the statement is false).
Conclusion: Socrates has a beard. (The statement is probably Inductively True, since we have statues, paintings and references depicting Socrates as a man with a beard, therefore we know that this is probably True). Notice that our argument, although deductively valid, has one inductively false premise (Premise 2), and this does not make the conclusion necessarily inductively false.
Which means that the relationship between induction and deduction is very tricky.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/42481. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
A textbook I used to use for technical writing had this on the cover
Nobody wants to read what you write.
That sounds discouraging, but often people are looking at technical information to answer a specific question or solve a problem. Even if I'm getting lost in a Wikipedia Hole, it's because I had a question. (It then became three more questions...)
Always consider audience and purpose. Who is reading and why?
My drafts are long, too, but when I edit, I try to focus on the reader's next question.
A great resource is www.plainlanguage.gov .
0 comment threads