Post History
Say you wrote a piece that was about something wonderful that had happened to you. A piece that exuded happiness and contentment. Someone—probably the very same person you discuss in your questio...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-20T00:40:38Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/42577 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T11:00:26Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/42577 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Say you wrote a piece that was about something wonderful that had happened to you. A piece that exuded happiness and contentment. Someone—probably the very same person you discuss in your question—is going to comment, "How can you be so happy all the time? What is wrong with you? Don't you know people are suffering in the world?" It's not critique vs nitpicking. Nitpicking would be "I didn't like your piece because you had the character get cherry vanilla ice cream from the cafeteria but we all know that the only fruit flavor there is strawberry." This is critique vs criticism. Critique is supposed to be useful (not always helpful, though it often is). Criticism is not for the author, it's for the person saying it (or it's part of a review meant for potential readers/customers/etc). There is always going to be someone who doesn't like your work. And that's okay. _You're not writing for them._
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-02-24T17:59:46Z (almost 6 years ago)
Original score: 17