Post History
Details and structure define the tone of how something is read, and names are a detail. Whether or not a character/prop should have a name will depend on how you want the story to feel to the read...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/42824 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Details and structure define the tone of how something is read, and names are a detail. Whether or not a character/prop should have a name will depend on how you want the story to feel to the reader, and ties in to the traits of characters (and narrator[s]) in the story you're telling. In _most_ stories, having a scene where the main character walks into a bar and lists off **everyone there** , by name, and in detail, is likely to come off as weird/annoying/tiring, and probably completely unneeded. In a story that specifically deals with exploring the life of someone with autism/obsessive traits and how that impacts their perception of reality, then it may not only be fitting, but may offer a highly effective layer to the overall tone and feel of a story. (In which case, the main character _not knowing_ the name of some random basically one time prop-character could even become the entire plot of a story as they try to find a pointless name to put with a meaningless face.) In short, names and details in and of themselves are neither a downside nor an upside to writing. _Their impact on the flow, tone, and feel_ of the writing is what we need to care about. Does the name/detail/structure bring your piece _closer_ to the flow/tone/feel you are after? - Then it is a good thing and should be included. Does it take you further away from what you're after? Then rework the piece to better meet the goals of your story.