Post History
Complex, well-rounded characters can add a lot to a story; on the other hand, lots of good stories manage without them. What you want to avoid is characters that feel flat, unbelievable and/or cl...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/3061 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/3061 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Complex, well-rounded characters can add a lot to a story; on the other hand, lots of good stories manage without them. **What you want to avoid** is characters that feel flat, unbelievable and/or cliche. That's because if the reader feels that way about a character, he feels that the story is false, artificially constructed. The reader will often react in one or both of the following ways: - "Sheesh, that character makes no sense - a real person would never act that way!" - "Oh, yawn - it's another by-the-numbers (choose one: Romantic Love Interest/Kooky Friend/Vulnerable ArchVillain/etc./etc.)." If your writing isn't outright _bad_ (which, hey, it might be), then simple characters might work quite well for a lot of types of books. The rule of thumb is, **the more central character, personality, and relationships are to the book - the more crucial it is for the characters to be complex and detailed.** In other words, your character work needs to be strong enough to bear the weight you're going to put on it - you can't let it be less; it doesn't have to be more. For example, you can't have a deep exploration of your protagonist's soul and his relationship with his dysfunctional family, if you portray him as being deep and complex, and the family as a bunch of twits. It doesn't match up - and calling the reader's attention to the _depth_ of your protagonist's character will have them looking for the same in the rest of the cast. It'd be like watching a fight between Dostoyevsky and Bugs Bunny. But **even when you can manage without them, having more complex characters is a major plus.** It contributes to a sense of depth and realism; it avoids not only bald cliches but also the familiar and not-terribly-interesting; it earns more reader involvement and investment. Of course, this too can be taken too far - you don't want to swamp your story with irrelevant details, or lose reader interest in the protagonist because you're trying to devote attention to a bunch of characters who really aren't very central. The concerns I've laid out here are, IMHO, good ones to guide you when developing and portraying characters; from here, what you need to do is be aware of these different concerns and considerations, and find a good balance them that works well for your characters and story.