Post History

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44086
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

There are no hard and fast rules here about what will work. What we believe to be true is often based on the context of our upbringing and that has changed from era to era AND location to location for humanity alone; not even considering aliens. "Foreign Perspective" is probably the right terminology to use here because even if you don't have Extra Terrestrial "aliens" this problem repeats itself just among humans. Write a time travel story where a slave owner and a modern African American need to talk about something; or a nazi and a zionist; or even lover of hamburgers and a vegan.

The answer, [according to popular writing podcast "Writing Excuses"](https://writingexcuses.com/2018/11/04/13-44-alien-characters/), is to really think about what it means to be that type of alien. What are the hard and fast rules that they go through? They will have to eat something. How has that shaped their species level behavior? Their reproduction habits will affect the way they socialize. The way they relate to each other will create their species politics. But, no one entity in the species needs to be a "Monolith".

> A Monolith is a character that is "extreme and exact" in its nature and "represents everyone". Your characters should almost never be monoliths. A Monolith is a character who becomes the stereotype for a race, ethnicity, or species. Monoliths are considered racially problematic in modern literature, but the idea easily extends elsewhere.

After you know the generic drives of a species you are going to need points reference in your story, if you have space, that allow individual differentiation. Maybe reproduction is a form of coupling as it is for many species on earth; but the method to get to coupling might vary from individual to individual. Maybe reproduction involves the collection of spores from the air. In which case positioning oneself at the right place at the right time would matter a lot. Not everyone can be in the same place at the same time; what types of character traits might evolve to push an individual to have different behavior. How might that be inherited? How might experience change that behavior?

Not everything is about reproduction, but it serves as a good example for how a Species might have a generic goal and individuals might have unique ways of serving that goal. Some individuals might even ignore that goal or fail to achieve it for a multitude of reasons.

Once you know the parameters the "Foreign entity" is operating in, and you have a good idea of how they're going to go about their own individual response to those parameters, its time to think about how a person of your audience's perspective might best relate. At this point you look for commonality. I may never be a tree in my life. I may never reach out into the sky to collect sunlight or bend to the wind or collect pollen from the air so that I may produce the perfect nut.

As an author, I might personify a tree or find commonalities. I might introduce some of the logical architecture that allows me to understand what's driving the alien in human terms. At the end of the day, writers are much less concerned about what's different than what ends up being the same. The things that are different you hang a lamp on; you highlight them, but move on without dwelling. Otherwise today people tend to write the aliens as if they are humans with different objectives and sensibilities. If you'r going to take on the perspective of the alien, the best you can do is translate that perspective for a human audience.

### Humor

Humor is kind of adjacent to all of this, but dealing with a conflict in perspective makes for a potentially comedic fertile field. I don't want to get into comedic convention. It's a separate consideration. You'd ultimately want to study comedy. [Something like the "Reverse" is going to be pretty easy](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fhfxJRG1DU) with a foreign perspective.

> **A Comedic Reverse Is:** Say a thing that implies X (possibly a false dichotomy). Give a bit more detail about your personal story, investing the audience in believing X will happen, most definitely. Instead say that all of that actually meant Y, which is the opposite of X. The unexpected result short circuits the brain and causes a response we call laughter.

Obviously there are more versions of comedy, but for an Alien you might have something like this:

1. Alien describes animal its observing in all of the classic ways humanity would think implied the animal would be a good pet.
2. Alien gives more detail which makes the audience like the pet and invest in its emotional well being.
3. Alien eats pet. All of the prior attributes make the meal particularly enjoyable.

If done right horror is only a shade off from humor. The "snatch" of we're going to like this pet, to "this animal tastes wonderful" is the "joke". Our inability to fully classify the thing as an atrocity, our understanding of both why we think the animal is a pet and our perception that the alien (who we also like) thinks the animal is a wonderful meal conflict in our brains.

Get a book on humor and you can probably build better more interesting jokes than that one, but that one will and probably has served some author.

Original score: 4