Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Plain language with long required phrases

I am trying to create documentation for an application, and it's for end users who use keyboard (not mouse) and a screen reader. Some of our conventions require us to always use the full phrase ...

1 answer  ·  posted 5y ago by April Salutes Monica C.‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2020-02-10T14:22:56Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/44362
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T11:38:07Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/44362
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T11:38:07Z (about 5 years ago)
I am trying to create documentation for an application, and it's for end users who use keyboard (not mouse) and a screen reader.

Some of our conventions require us to always use the full phrase as listed on screen: if we're talking about the category combo box, but the label says " **Please pick a Category:"** [sic], that's what we have to use.

Another convention is for keyboard shortcuts -- they are always several "words" long, as we use white space (or I go non-breaking-space) between each element of it. So we have **CTRL + INSERT + T** for tables list.

So as you may have noticed, I have a tendency towards long sentences with many clauses. I'm using [Hemingway](http://www.hemingwayapp.com) to check each section for [Plain Language](https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/concise/), and I'm trying to revise the hard/very hard sentences.

The problem is, my sentences are often very long _and it's not my fault!_

If I replace a multi-word phrase whether keyboard shortcut or on-screen label with "xx," that usually brings the sentence's word count down that the sentences "pass."

Is this "cheating?" Are these "terms of art" and it's ok to say "Ctrl + INSert + number pad 6" is understood as a "word?"

Should _only_ the keyboard shortcuts count as 1-word, as the users may know them from other uses of the screenreader, (so replacing them mentally with "X" for a plainLang check is ok), but "envelope Send Email checkbox" still has to count as 4 words, as they would be new to the user? Or only the first-usage within a section?

_Note: My workplace doesn't allow the use of 2nd person, despite PlainLang encouraging personal pronouns -- I'm already "wasting" words by having to always say "the user" instead of "you."_

**I'd like to know if other technical writers have a consensus on how to handle these conflicts.**

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-04-04T14:07:12Z (over 5 years ago)
Original score: 8