Post History
Seems totally fine to me. However, what really matters is your actual audience. This sounds like a case where maybe the best approach is to go ahead, write what seems best to you, without worrying ...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2020-01-22T08:51:07Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44639 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T11:43:11Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44639 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Seems totally fine to me. However, what really matters is your actual audience. This sounds like a case where maybe the best approach is to go ahead, write what seems best to you, without worrying too much about it--but then seek the responses of a sufficient number of representative beta readers. Even if you could very convincingly argue what the "right" approach is, what would it matter if the result sounded bad to the ears of your intended audience? (I remember this issue being discussed in the writing excuses podcast; if you search for "beta readers" you'll probably find several useful episodes.)
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-04-16T11:39:20Z (over 5 years ago)
Original score: 6