What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?
I have been hired as a Technical Writer at a firm who needed multiple types of writers: A few people were hired to write content for the average website reader interested in our product, such as a Product Manager, and user documentation, such as user guides. However, I was hired to dig down into the code and actually write sample code to explain how to use the company's SDK (software development kit). I interface with the development team on a daily basis and actually test their code, analyze it, and give them suggestions for improvement.
I would like to add another descriptive term in my job title on my email signature and resume to show that I have in-depth software engineering knowledge. For anyone who thinks this is to puff myself up or to downplay normal Technical Writers, you are wrong. The primary reason I want to do this is so my resume doesn't look like I switched careers. The secondary reason is so that people who receive my emails and read my resume can tell by my title that I have extensive software engineering experience inside software development.
I read this, but it didn't help. Of course, I searched the internet, too. I found articles about my current role, but nothing about job titles.
I thought perhaps:
- Technical Writer (Sr. Software Engineer)
- Technical Writer as Sr. Software Engineer
- Technical Writer specializing in the full SDLC
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/44693. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
This is a challenging specialization to capture in a job title, which is why my LinkedIn tagline says "speaker to programmers". But that doesn't work as a job title at any but the edgiest startups.
As suggested in this answer, some use Programming Writer. At a previous company I was documenting but also improving (and writing examples against) our SDK, and where we wanted to make it more clear to upper management and our new corporate overloads that I'm an engineering-grade technical writer, they gave me the title (Senior) SDK Developer. Depending on how involved you are in defining your SDK, that could work for you too.
At my current company I'm an Information Developer because that's the title they use; internally people know that I have programming cred, and if I need to communicate it externally, I'll probably have more than a title available to do it with. On a resume, for example, there are a couple ways to convey important information not covered in a job title. On LinkedIn (and in a cover letter) you can write a summary that people will see before they get to the job history. If I'm handing somebody a business card (I guess that could happen), we'll have the context of whatever conversation led to me doing so.
In my career I've found that the adjective (senior, principal, lead...) carries more weight than the specific tech-writer-ish title. If you get to principal/lead level, people who know anything at all about the field are going to expect you to have some real technical depth.
0 comment threads
I really like the title "Developer Evangelist" or "Developer Advocate". The former implies that you're spreading knowledge about the company's software/SDK, but that you're also a Developer. The latter implies that you're helping developers interface with your company. I think the former title might be more suited to your preferences. This title is in common usage; e.g. Microsoft uses it: https://careers.microsoft.com/us/en/c-evangelism
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44702. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
The conventional term is "programmer writer" or, sometimes, "programming writer". It is generally used to describe someone whose training and focus is programming rather than technical writing, but who is currently performing a technical communication function specifically aimed at documenting things for programmers. I did most of my tech writing for developers as well, but because my career focus was technical writing, I stuck to the term "technical writer". Same job, more or less. The difference in titles is more to cover differences in career track, which seems to be what you are concerned about.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads