Post History
You don't have to put the homicide into Chapter 1, but you might want to. While this approach is a well-worn cliche of police procedurals, especially series (in which the protagonist is known in ad...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44750 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
You don't _have_ to put the homicide into Chapter 1, but you might want to. While this approach is a well-worn cliche of police procedurals, especially series (in which the protagonist is known in advance), it is nevertheless an excellent way to lead into introducing the protagonist: _An injustice has been done. The world cries out for a hero._ Then you go on describing the hero's daily life, dropping breadcrumbs and red herrings to lead him/her to the main conflict. **The advantages:** - Leading with intriguing events can help grab and maintain readers' attention. - Readers will be spotting the breadcrumbs and feeling clever. - Dramatic irony -- the hero makes an observation the reader already knows is wrong, misses one of the chances to get involved -- works on the _first_ readthrough. - Readers are instantly invested in the hero because they want someone to set things right. **The pitfalls:** - The initial sequence must matter in the larger scope, which can potentially make you show your hand too early. - Some readers may grow impatient with the pace of the story because they know where it's going and would rather it got there already. - Some readers may feel cheated that the first point-of-view character gets killed for "cheap thrills".