How can I effectively research for a high-fantasy setting?
When you write in a modern day setting, you research the culture, climate, location and history of that setting. You can do the same for historical fiction or low-fantasy settings based on real places.
When you write for a high-fantasy setting none of this information exists. The history, culture, environment and peoples are entirely your own creation. How can you effectively use research to help create interesting high-fantasy settings?
Some methods I have used include:
- Read a lot of other works in the genre. Borrow the things I like.
- Base parts of the setting on real world cultures or locations.
- Do no research and make it up as I go.
The problem with the first two methods is that they often result in unoriginal/boring settings that have been done to death. The third method is a lot of work and often ends with plot holes or inconsistency in world-building. Any advice people can give on how to use research to improve my high-fantasy settings is useful.
4 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Base parts of the setting on real world cultures or locations.
Unless you have near-infinite time to do your worldbuilding, you're probably going to keep coming back to our world. So start there! Not in the sense of "modern-day Earth with the serial numbers filed off", but in the sense of specific examples that are already fairly detail-rich. For example:
If you need to show a language, think about what broad properties you want it to have, look for a known language (could be historic) that has many of those properties, and study that as a baseline, then adapt. Instead of choosing between a deep dive into constructed languages or a dozen phrases with no clear grammar structures, adapt something that already has vocabulary and grammar and sounds to your liking.
If you need a physical setting, learn from ones that already exist. Your story is set in the molten lava fields of the salamanders' homeland? What details can you glean from volcanoes here on Earth, both when they erupt and when they simmer for decades without erupting?
If you're developing a new culture, what are its defining elements and do you know any cultures that share some of those elements that you can study? How do people in nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes manage childcare? What consequences do you see in the economies of nations that are always at war?
It's fun to reason out things like this, and I can suggest a site that can help with everything from orbital mechanics to centaur clothing, but you probably don't have time to work it all out for yourself, and there are probably some analogues already here in this world that you can look to for inspiration and some implementation details.
0 comment threads
If you are writing via planning and worldbuilding, your creative process goes like this:
idea => concept => detailed plot/setting
Research can be (and should be) used in every step of the process. Your methods #1 and #2 seem to imply that this research should predate the "idea" step and should be a source of inspiration. I can not really suggest anything there. Anything that gives the writer new ideas is a good thing, but this is highly personal.
A different kind of research is needed when an idea is developed into a concept, and then concept serves as a stage for specific plot developments. Obviously, you would want to avoid any holes in concept and in plot, and likely want to avoid any striking similarities with existing stories. So, after you have your idea, #1 question is
Have this been done before?
If you are well familiar with your genre, chances are that you immediately can pinpoint other works where something similar had been done. Anyways, it would be good to do some Google or TV Tropes search to see how original your idea really is. The outcome could be different:
- Looks like my idea is very original. Hooray!
- Other people have done similar things, but my idea is really different;
- My idea is not new at all. Duh!
Even if your idea is not new, that's not necessarily bad. In fantasy genre the setting is important, but the story is the most important part. You may use cookie-cutter elves, dwarves and dragons if you like. If your story is original, it would be perfectly fine. Conversely, if your story is a collection of well-worn tropes, fresh and original setting may not be enough to save your book.
If your idea is original enough, the next question is
Does this concept make sense?
As you flesh out your world, you need to understand how this novel idea would work out in everyday life. It's easier if the idea is not very novel, because other people have already done the work of rationalizing the concept, or supplying some "standardized" magic to make some non-scientific concepts (like flying and fire-breathing dragons) to work without readers asking too many questions. If your idea is very novel, you need to make it work with the minimum amount of necessary explanations. For example, if levitation magic is widespread in your world, it would be natural for different creatures and people to fly. Otherwise, the reader would be striving for an explanation.
I can recommend to get familiar with Brandon Sanderson's First Law, Second Law and Third Law of Magic. Also, other answers have already recommended the sister worldbuilding site where you can find help polishing your concepts.
After you are satisfied with your concept, you can move to the plot. And here lies the next question:
Do I need to tweak my concept to make the plot work?
Here is the area where (imho) most promising, but less than perfect stories are suffering. This problem is by no way limited to the fantasy genre, but it is particularly common here. You need some magic to move your plot and resolve your conflicts, but you don't want it to look like you are inventing new things as you go just to push the plot in the right direction. Again, I can recommend reading Brandon Sanderson's opinion here. It is Ok to encounter new things while on a journey, but it's not Ok to create some reader's expectations and continuously smash them by introducing more and more new things.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44900. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
I think for option 2, the problem is if you research the same things everyone else researches, your fantasy will reflect that, and thus have...
unoriginal/boring settings that have been done to death
Can you research other cultures? For example, in answering someone's question about fire/ice and elements, I found this site https://fireupwaterdown.com , and from there, let's look at this post: https://fireupwaterdown.com/2015/10/14/dragons-a-force-of-nature/
Dragons aren't always fire, some are wind or rain. I think part of what made The Never Ending Story by Michael Ende stand out to me was the Luck Dragon -- instead of a typical European Dragon, Ende brought in a more eastern conception.
A cultural-sensitivity reader/advisor is a good idea -- you want to be careful you're not fetishizing the "exotic" or doing things that are done to death in other places. (Killing your particular superhero's girlfriend may make sense for the story as it is, but DO note that it's part of a larger pattern of killing superhero's girlfriends.)
But picking a few elements from another culture and having them be baseline in your fantasy may allow great new combinations. I highlight that word, because I feel that most originality is about mixing the right things together in a new way.
Black Panther, besides being part of the Marvel (fantasy) cinematic universe, also postulated an African nation without a colonialist past. The designers used elements from the real countries of Lesotho (blanket design) and Congo (rare minerals). Each tribe within Wakanda was based on details from real, sub-Saharan nations. Things were mixed, but with thought and specifics, not a random mish-mosh. (I'm white & American, so I may be missing many nuances, of course. I'm an optimist though, and assume that this was all respectfully done.)
So my advice for research is to go farther afield than you expect.
0 comment threads
Warning: this answer links repeatedly to TV Tropes. Don't let this happen to you.
Since all three methods you mentioned have drawbacks, I'll try to suggest tweaks to them.
Let's start with reading the genre, then borrowing what you like. This amasses facts of the form "when it comes to X, story Y does it in way Z". Apart from your concern that this is boring or unoriginal, reading the works themselves to get these facts can be very inefficient. Now, writers should read widely, of course; but this is not, IMHO, one of the reasons to do it (at least, not if by "read" you mean "read works" rather than "read about the works", an underappreciated item in the writer's toolkit).
Instead, go through these pages' examples regardless of medium and genre, Ctrl+Fing for these keywords; and rather than borrowing these ideas wholesale, think about what assumptions you've made they challenge, then see what that helps you come up with. That'll hopefully make it much more original, much more interesting. The best litmus test you'll have access to is whether it interests you.
I contest that real-world settings have to be boring or unoriginal, but it depends on which ones you pick. Guess what: we all (think we) know ancient Rome. There have been so many cultures in history, even in one region over time. The world's empires alone will give you all the fodder you need for something unlike anything you've ever read. So will the world's religions. I know I keep mentioning Coco, but I learned so much from that film about both certain afterlife beliefs and real Mexican culture.
Having said all that, one culture may not be enough for you. You're trying to write a story that makes internal sense, and cultures often don't. Greek myths, for example, are incredibly inconsistent. (Usually if I look up one of their deities' parents, I discover sources differ.) Cut and change what doesn't work, and borrow from a second culture, real or imaginary, if you have to.
For the third option, work smarter, not harder. If your creative focus is on characters first, and you reveal only what you have to about their culture for their decisions and misadventures to make sense, you'll have your best chance of having a first draft that makes sense. Now, let me be clear: you can come up with a Hemingway-style iceberg early on, maybe even spend the first few pages fleshing it out. You will excise it, just as you'll excise the occasional inconsistency you encounter in a read-through. Nine times out of ten, you'll only need to delete or rewrite one sentence or paragraph to fix it anyway.
Even fantasy is, to some extent, like realty unless noted. Sometimes you'll realise the people in your world couldn't do A the way we do because of B; on other occasions, you'll realise they would in fact do C like us, because people aren't (too) stupid or evil (or smart or good, depending on the parallel).
Above all, think about the tech and values of your culture. Have they legalised same-sex marriage, and did they read about the ruling on their smartphones? Feel free to move forward or backward relative to our timeline, of course. Fix what bugs you about the conventions of the genre.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/44856. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads