Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A The unknown and unexplained in science fiction

Science fiction has been defined as a genre where the "incredible" elements are "recognizable as not-true, but also as not-unlike-true, not-flatly- (and in the current state of knowledge) impossibl...

7 answers  ·  posted 5y ago by Liquid‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-13T11:56:51Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/44978
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T11:49:37Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/44978
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T11:49:37Z (almost 5 years ago)
Science fiction has been defined as a genre where the "incredible" elements are "recognizable as not-true, but also as not-unlike-true, not-flatly- (and in the current state of knowledge) impossible" (According to Darko Suvin, from Wikipedia [link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fiction#cite_ref-metamorphoses_7-0)).

This is often compared against fantasy, where magic has no pretense of being scientifically possible.

Yet, sometimes an author doesn't want to get into lengthy explanations for every technology that appears in a novel. This may be for a variety of reasons, brevity being one of them, keeping an air of mystery another.

Let's suppose there is this technology X. X works following some even remotely possible scientific concept. The author knows the concept, but never explains it. X gets a lot of space in the novel: the reader can see the technology in use, understand what it does, and even what it requires to work. Maybe it's a machine needing fuel and electricity. Maybe it's a weapon emitting huge ray bursts.

In short, X's effects are clear, but the details of X's inner working are never laid out.

**How can the author maintain a pretense of "scientific plausibility" without giving a reasonable explanation?** After all, X is never explained out loud; the scientific principles that it operates on are left entirely on speculation.

**Probably related:**

- [The role of inexplicable events in hard science fiction](https://writing.stackexchange.com/questions/37798/the-role-of-inexplicable-events-in-hard-science-fiction)
- [The role of the supernatural in hard science fiction](https://writing.stackexchange.com/questions/37828/the-role-of-the-supernatural-in-hard-science-fiction)
- [Spiritual elements in a science-fiction novel](https://writing.stackexchange.com/questions/6339/spiritual-elements-in-a-science-fiction-novel)
#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-05-06T12:55:20Z (over 5 years ago)
Original score: 26