Post History
Putting scientific definition aside, "Flower head" works better since it's a personification. The human reader has no trouble associating the upper part of a body with the upper part of a flower. ...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T11:56:52Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/45935 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T12:10:37Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/45935 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Putting scientific definition aside, "Flower head" works better since it's a personification. The human reader has no trouble associating the upper part of a body with the upper part of a flower. On the contrary, "a flower's heart" is a little harder to imagine. Without further context, I would struggle to understand what you mean, exspecially since I'm not an expert botanist (before looking it up on google, I had no idea how a Zinnia's looked like). It could still work, providing more context: > _“……she dived between the Zinnia's petals, in the secluded heart that kept the pollen safe…"_
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-06-12T14:31:52Z (over 5 years ago)
Original score: 9