Post History
I don't think it is too important. I read a story (can't remember the name) in which two POVs were presented, one from like a century ago, and one in the future! The early POV was an ancestor of th...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-19T22:13:49Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/46432 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T12:22:50Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/46432 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I don't think it is too important. I read a story (can't remember the name) in which two POVs were presented, one from like a century ago, and one in the future! The early POV was an ancestor of the later POV, and his descendant was unraveling a mystery about his ancestor, while the early POV was actually about the circumstances that led to this mystery, which were entertaining as well. In a way they proceeded somewhat in parallel, the later POV discovering clues (and getting confused, etc) about what we just read the earlier POV was doing. I think the thing to worry about non-chronological adventures is killing suspense for the early POV by revealing something in the later POV (which obviously might know the future or fate of the early POV). You need both POV's to be interesting until the end of their respective times. If your later POV is mostly in the last half, then giving too much information about what happened in **his** past could be a spoiler for what is **yet** to happen in the early POV story. But that is just something to be careful with, not a reason to not do it.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-07-03T15:33:27Z (over 5 years ago)
Original score: 4