Post History
For whom have my hands laboured, Urshanabi? Both temporary setbacks and unexpected failures in the end are entirely appropriate. Unexpectedly unhappy endings are as old as civilization. The best...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/47406 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
## For whom have my hands laboured, Urshanabi? Both temporary setbacks and unexpected failures in the end are entirely appropriate. Unexpectedly unhappy endings are [as old as civilization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh). The best ending for the characters and the best ending for an acclaimed book are often different. This is normal. It is a hallmark of the writer's craft to make the reader feel sad for the characters in-universe but at the same time feel happy about having read the book. Temporary setbacks are _mandatory_: they are [the building blocks of the story](https://www.slashfilm.com/a-letter-from-david-mamet-to-the-writers-of-the-unit/). > Every scene must be dramatic. That means: the main character must have a simple, straightforward, pressing need which impels him or her to show up in the scene. > > This need is why they _came_. It is what the scene is about. Their attempt to get this need met _will_ lead, at the end of the scene, to _failure_ – this is how the scene is _over_. It, this failure, will, then, of necessity, propel us into the _next_ scene.