Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Are illustrations in novels frowned upon?

There are exceptions to the "no illustrations" trend. For example, Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrel is filled with black-and-white illustrations reminiscent of the wood engravings...

posted 4y ago by Galastel‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by System‭

Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-12T21:57:41Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/47423
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T12:45:28Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/47423
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T12:45:28Z (over 4 years ago)
There are exceptions to the "no illustrations" trend. For example, Susanna Clarke's _Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrel_ is filled with black-and-white illustrations reminiscent of the wood engravings that would have accompanied 19th-century books. This is in line with the novel's general style, a tribute to 19th century literature.

However, in general, you are right - illustrations are rare, particularly in paperbacks. The issue, as you've guessed, is the price. There's paying the artist; there's printing the illustrations - ink costs money, particularly if you want coloured illustrations; there's arranging the pages so the illustrations fit in. In order for a coloured illustration to go in a paperback, it needs to be on a separate page of different paper quality; if the illustration is black and white, it still means more paper. All of those elements add up to make the illustrated book more expensive to produce. If you provide the illustrations, you eliminate one element here, but not all.

If a publisher is going to invest more money in an illustrated print, they need to know the investment will pay off. They need to know enough buyers would be willing to pay the extra cost to cover the publisher's expenses. With a new writer, that's unlikely to happen - a new writer is a risk as is, their books might not sell. Which is why you see illustrated editions of established writers, particularly of their best-known works. Examples are J.R.R. Tolkien's [_The Lord of the Rings_](https://www.tolkien.co.uk/products/the-lord-of-the-rings-illustrated-slipcased-edition-j-r-r-tolkien-alan-lee-9780007525546/) and Ursula Le Guin's [_Earthsea_](https://www.bookdepository.com/The-Books-of-Earthsea-Ursula-K-Le-Guin/9781481465588?redirected=true&utm_medium=Google&utm_campaign=Base2&utm_source=IL&utm_content=The-Books-of-Earthsea&selectCurrency=ILS&w=AFF9AU96QH65NGA80T5X&pdg=aud-346191234401:pla-309526196374:kwd-309526196374:cmp-1348818631:adg-50951271061:crv-263323334808:pid-9781481465588:dev-c&gclid=CjwKCAjwkenqBRBgEiwA-bZVtvHecTeDKbWkP4_TrxRUIUlj1MwW7ckun2UbFrCCAghYyQP9AWbP1BoCa5kQAvD_BwE). In both cases, the books in question have become a classic, so there's no risk for the publisher in printing hardbacks with coloured illustrations.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-08-19T20:26:13Z (over 4 years ago)
Original score: 32