Post History
I find it odd that this hasn't come up yet, so here's another alternative to the dilemma, that provides a purely technical solution: A has access to overpowered magic, right? He doesn't have to k...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T12:58:34Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/48055 License name: CC BY-SA 4.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Brilliand
·
2019-12-08T12:58:34Z (almost 5 years ago)
I find it odd that this hasn't come up yet, so here's another alternative to the dilemma, that provides a purely technical solution: A has access to overpowered magic, right? He doesn't have to kill to win. All that he has to do is prove that B will never defeat him - either by nonlethally subduing B several times, _permanently_ nonlethally subduing B (say by putting some form of long-term curse on him), or by escaping to a place where B has no realistic chance of being able to follow. Depending on the particulars of the nonlethal solution used, A could come off as a superior person patiently putting up with B's idiocy, a villain who only technically upholds his vow while still being generally nasty, or a frightened innocent successfully escaping from the real villain.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-09-18T22:32:35Z (about 5 years ago)
Original score: 1