Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Detail vs. filler

I've always struggled with sensory details in my writing --I'm a dialog-and-plot kind of writer. But for me, writing details really came alive when I discovered your number three approach. When d...

posted 5y ago by Chris Sunami‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T13:00:30Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/48145
License name: CC BY-SA 4.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Chris Sunami‭ · 2019-12-08T13:00:30Z (almost 5 years ago)
I've always struggled with sensory details in my writing --I'm a dialog-and-plot kind of writer. But for me, writing details really came alive when I discovered your number three approach. When done right, **the details offer you so much opportunity for layered, immersive storytelling.** Perfunctory, by-the-book, generic "filler" details definitely aren't worth the space they take up on the page.

For that reason I think **it's NOT overkill for every word and every detail to mean something**. Every detail IS important in the work of the great writers. But the key is to not foreground the work you're doing. It should _feel_ organic, even when it isn't, and operate largely at a subconscious level for the reader. If the reader is noticing how clever or how hardworking you are, it's not a good thing.

I've elaborated more on [the ways of using details](https://writing.stackexchange.com/questions/46974/building-a-scene-and-readability/47006#47006) in answers elsewhere, but you seem to have a good handle on the general idea --you want to **put the reader in the head, and mind, and perspective and history of the character** , and not just give a dry recital of the objects in the room.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-09-23T19:02:11Z (about 5 years ago)
Original score: 5