Post History
I'm proofreading a novel - the brief has instructed that I do not make any stylistic changes, and correct only the obvious errors that impede sense/clarity. There are several places where I feel a...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T13:05:51Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/48367 License name: CC BY-SA 4.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
user753711
·
2019-12-08T13:05:51Z (almost 5 years ago)
I'm proofreading a novel - the brief has instructed that I do not make any stylistic changes, and correct only the obvious errors that impede sense/clarity. There are several places where I feel an exclamation mark is missing: a) "Good God, I hope not," responded Sue. b) Suddenly, one of the first violinists nudged her companion, and hissed: "Oh good grief, look over there." My feeling is that these are classic examples of exclamatory sentences (Good God! Good grief!) and so it is a basic error to miss the exclamation mark. However, I don't want to interfere with the writer's style if they intend a more laconic tone of voice. I don't think this is the case in (b) at least, due to the use of the word 'hissed', but perhaps I should leave the first example alone, as I don't know for sure what tone of voice isn't intended? Any advice from experienced proofreaders would be much appreciated - should I concern myself with punctuation to this extent, or leave it alone if the sentence can be understood clearly?
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2019-10-04T09:57:12Z (about 5 years ago)
Original score: 1