Author's notes: yay or nay?
Should a writer include author's notes in their book that either express thanks to the reader or provide background information on the book itself? If so, should these be at the front of the book or the back of the book?
To expand on this, is there any specific type of information that should be included in an author's notes section of a book?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/3538. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
Short thanks and dedications (about a page's worth, tops) can go at the front of the book, any lengthy "author's note" should, in my opinion, go towards the back, as "bonus material" 9as it were).
If it's needing to be in front to make the book readable, there's more work to be done on the book.
Sometimes, more lengthy introductions work, but the few times I've seen that, it's either been a case of "early manuscript finished by new author" or "collection of stories" and that is not your typical book.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/4135. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
I personally love it when an author takes the time to put an "author's note" into the book. it makes it feel so much more like they're writing it for you. if you are going to put a writer's note in the book, it should always be at the back. Why, you ask? Because if you put it in the front, you may ruin the ending for the reader. (Always beware of spoilers in the synopsis as well.)
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/4114. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
Sure, why not?
I think thanks should be in front and information should be at the back. Gratitude should be expressed early on, and homework should only be offered if the reader is still interested. Otherwise the frontspiece turns into tl;dr.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads