Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Is quality of writing subjective, or objective?

When someone says that writing is good or bad, better or worse, is it merely a way to talk about whether something is popular, or interesting to you? Or is there more to it than that? Compare the...

2 answers  ·  posted 5y ago by Jedediah‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by Mark Baker‭

Question text-analysis
#4: Question reopened by user avatar Mark Baker‭ · 2020-02-15T14:05:22Z (over 4 years ago)
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T13:13:39Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/48907
License name: CC BY-SA 4.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Jedediah‭ · 2019-12-08T13:13:39Z (almost 5 years ago)
When someone says that writing is good or bad, better or worse, is it merely a way to talk about whether something is popular, or interesting to you? Or is there more to it than that? Compare the two passages:

> Where dips the rocky highland  
> Of Sleuth Wood in the lake,  
> There lies a leafy island  
> Where flapping herons wake  
> The drowsy water rats...  
> -From "The Stolen Child", by W. B. Yeats

and

> The dog saw a frog  
> On a log in the bog.

I'm less interested in why Yeat's poem is technically better (unless your argument is that technical quality is the only objective measure of quality in writing). Rather, is there writing that is better or worse? Is it possible to quantify such a thing?

(Obviously, this will be seen by some as primarily opinion based - since I'm asking what exactly opinions are or should be based on.)

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-11-11T18:32:31Z (almost 5 years ago)
Original score: 0