Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Rep for Meta questions

+5
−0

At the moment, it appears we're receiving rep for Meta questions and answers, same as for regular questions and answers. Is that how we want it?

I can see arguments both ways:

  • Participation in Meta is part of building a community, which is something we want. So rewarding that might not be a bad thing. Certainly at the moment the Meta activity is contributing to the site no less than asking and answering writing questions.
  • On the other hand, we're rather used to a different style of voting on Meta: agree-disagree rather than useful-not useful. Do we want Meta downvotes to affect people's rep?
  • Should reputation reflect "how much I know about writing", in which case Meta participation is less relevant, or should it reflect a general "how much I do here"?
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »