Post History

I think on the whole, anything that was marked "keeping only for historical value" -- those are probably delete-able.  In general, how many of the oldest questions ARE worth keeping as they are?  Should any be merged towards a NEWER duplicate instead of the newer ones going to the older ones?

Also, do we plan to handle duplicates the exact same way SE did? I'd love if there were a way to "cluster" them -- instead of saying "this one is a duplicate and thus not needed," say "this appears to be a duplicate of that -- people may have several ways of coming to this question, so we'll CLUSTER it with the core one, but it can stay as its own branch?  Something like that.