Post History
Here's a set of guidelines I really like: You can refer to each character by the moniker most appropriate to him, so long as you use the same one consistently. Readers will happily accept any nam...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/4148 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/4148 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Here's a set of guidelines I really like: - You can refer to each character by the moniker most appropriate to him, **so long as you use the same one consistently.** Readers will happily accept any name that seems appropriate; the important thing is not to confuse them by referring to one individual by a dozen different tags. - **You can have different _characters_ refer to an individual by different monikers,** so long as they do so consistently. This is a natural detail in relationships - "Captain Jon Smith" is "Jon" to his friends, "Smith" to his boss, "Captain Smith" when he's introduced in polite society, and either "Captain" or "Ol' Waxwhiskers" to his subordinates, depending whether or not he's in earshot. But again - each character is consistent in their own name for this individual. - For this purpose, **narration is a point-of-view,** so when you're referring to him in narrative (rather than a character mentioning him in dialogue), the name should be consistent, and probably should be **the name you'd most like _the reader_ to associate with the character** , for whatever reasons or preferences of your own. - If a single character is going to be addressed by several different names over the course of the story, then it's a good idea to **introduce the character by his full name (and title, nicknames, etc.) the first time we read about him.** e.g.: `Today was Captain Jon Smith's first day aboard the _H.M.S. Ratatouille_.` Then you can slip right in to your chosen moniker (`"What a great ship," Smith thought to himself, when he was interrupted - a kid was running towards him, yelling, "Captain! Captain! Come quick!"`), confident that from then on, the reader will be able to identify the character from any of a variety of references. (Without that, your references could be choppy and confusing - consider: `"So, first day onboard, eh, Jon?" said Bob. It was a nice ship, Smith had to admit - but just then, a kid burst out of nowhere, running towards him and yelling, "Captain! Captain!"`). **In conclusion,** there's no problem referring to the third character differently then the other two, particularly since you like the name better and (it seems) feel that it suits the character well. Just be consistent in how he's referred to, and you're good to go.