Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

81%
+7 −0
Q&A How do you avoid the problem of a collaborative work having separate voices?

Two authors divide duties, not content One very successful technique was the one used by Fletcher Pratt and L. Sprague de Camp in their wonderful fantasy romps such as Land of Unreason and The Inc...

posted 9y ago by Bill Blondeau‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T02:11:31Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/16935
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Bill Blondeau‭ · 2019-12-08T02:11:31Z (over 4 years ago)
## Two authors divide duties, not content

One very successful technique was the one used by Fletcher Pratt and L. Sprague de Camp in their wonderful fantasy romps such as [Land of Unreason](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_of_Unreason) and [The Incomplete Enchanter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incomplete_Enchanter).

Pratt, at the time the much more experienced and accomplished of the two, would rough out a plot. They would bounce it back and forth until it was ready; de Camp would write the first draft; Pratt would rewrite it; then deCamp would do the final edit for submission.

What this method accomplished was to avoid carving the work up into separate chunks. Instead, both authors had their fingers in all of it.

The quality of the result suggests that this might be a good way to do a collaborative work.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2015-04-22T17:29:02Z (almost 9 years ago)
Original score: 4