Post History
The problem is actually with "back and forth." That's because back is the return, but in the idiom it's placed before forth, which is the "going out" part. If you use take over and bring back, you'...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T12:00:06Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5203 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T02:14:52Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5203 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
The problem is actually with "back and forth." That's because _back_ is the return, but in the idiom it's placed before _forth_, which is the "going out" part. If you use _take over_ and _bring back,_ you'll eliminate some of the confusion. Streamline it and cut some of the figurative fluff. You want something more like: > The displayed works will take the viewers on a journey past the borders of the physical into the realm of the virtual, and then back again.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2012-03-09T15:12:47Z (about 12 years ago)
Original score: 7