Post History
I think you should do both. You will, without question, catch things on paper you don't see on the screen. It just looks different. I don't know why, but many years of experience have shown me thi...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T12:00:09Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5709 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T02:23:09Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5709 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I think you should do both. You will, without question, catch things on paper you don't see on the screen. It just looks different. I don't know why, but many years of experience have shown me this is true. However, you can also do a pass while reading it onscreen. I would use this method as a way of getting back into the book at the beginning of a session: you reread what you did the session before, or a section or two before, so you can clean up any obvious errors made in haste or connect dots you might have overlooked. Buy inexpensive paper, duplex, and recycle.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2012-05-20T02:27:51Z (over 12 years ago)
Original score: 0