Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Are there any specific rules to write Prequels and Sequels so that we don't end up with conflicting situations?

There are no rules; there is only what works, and you have to be the judge of that. But there are aids. Whenever you write multiple works using the same characters, you should keep a concordance. T...

posted 11y ago by Robusto‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T02:28:50Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/6161
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Robusto‭ · 2019-12-08T02:28:50Z (over 4 years ago)
There are no rules; there is only what works, and you have to be the judge of that. But there are aids. Whenever you write multiple works using the same characters, you should keep a _concordance_. This is a set of notes about characters and plot points, which you can refer to later when you forget what color hair a character has or who said or did what to whom.

You should always keep such notes and refresh them after each chapter or section. Modern software such as Scrivener automates the process, making it pretty easy. Tag your notes for cross-referencing. That way you never have to come adrift.

As for the "boring" problem, that is something a concordance won't help. There is nothing wrong with writing flashbacks (or flash-forwards) so long as they advance the current story. But remember it is the _current_ story you should be concerned with. Keep the flashbacks lean and pointed if you can. To suggest something in a few words is better than beating it to death in several chapters or scenes. I don't know if you watch _Breaking Bad_, but the opening of the current season has a flash-forward of the main character, Walter White, one year hence. He's in a Denny's, sardonically "celebrating" his 52nd birthday while he meets up with a man who is selling him an M-60 machine gun. It's a couple minutes of film, but it raises all kinds of questions in the viewer's mind. White is a scientist, not a thug —&nbsp;why does he need a machine gun? Why is he celebrating his birthday in an ironic echo of the way he celebrated his birthday a year earlier (the flash-forward has him mimicking the way he arranged bacon strips to form the numerals of his age in Season One, which will not escape the avid viewer's notice — and thereby suggesting a flashback within the flash-forward). We are at once wondering about his future while contemplating how far he has come from his past. If you can do _that_ sort of thing with your outside-of-timeline writing, you will be deepening and enhancing your present narrative.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2012-08-04T12:04:21Z (over 11 years ago)
Original score: 4