Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A How can people doing technical, archane work be portrayed interestingly?

Writing biographies like these for a mass audience will require that the reader understand the subject's work. This can be handled by long expository passages, or, as is more frequently done, conce...

posted 12y ago by Neil‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T02:34:44Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/6636
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T02:34:44Z (about 5 years ago)
Writing biographies like these for a mass audience will require that the reader understand the subject's work. This can be handled by long expository passages, or, as is more frequently done, concepts can be broken up into small, easily digestible pieces. These can alternate with the story of the subject's life, information provided to the reader only as is needed.

Many writers seem to have a knack for getting science writing "right", and I suggest that your best strategy is to read those books. Look at what these writers do well, and learn from it.

Here are just a few examples of the books I've read. While most of these are not biographical in nature, the same issues apply:

- [The Best American Science Writing](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0062091247) series is probably the best place for you to start. 
- Simon Winchester is a wonderful popularizer of history and science. His books cover geography and geology as well as politics and history. I particularly recommend [Krakatoa: The Day the World Exploded](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0060838590) for an amazing blend of sociology, geology, environmental issues, and politics. 
- Isaac Asimov was famous for making many, many topics accesible. He wrote books on physics and chemistry that may be of interest, despite being somewhat outdated now. [The Neutrino: Ghost Particle of the Atom](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0380004836) is a particular favorite of mine. 
- Brian Greene's book [The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0375708111) is a wonderful if slightly slow read. The book is somewhat technical but understandable if the reader sticks to it. 
- Carl Sagan's seminal book [Cosmos](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0345331354) is the essence of readable science popularization. 
- Stephen Hawking's [A Brief History of Time](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0553380168) and [The Universe in a Nutshell](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/055380202X) are great introductions to then-current theoretical physics. 
- [Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (Adventures of a Curious Character)](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0393316041) focuses more on Richard Feynman the man than the work, but is a great read and is well worth your time. 
#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2012-11-09T19:58:07Z (about 12 years ago)
Original score: 7