Post History
While it's true that: Editors do proof reading for you, and word processors have spell checking and grammar checking you do not always have an editor available, and software tools aren't perfec...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T02:45:08Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/7354 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
EpsilonVector
·
2019-12-08T02:45:08Z (almost 5 years ago)
While it's true that:
- Editors do proof reading for you, and
- word processors have spell checking and grammar checking
you do not always have an editor available, and software tools aren't perfect ("move" instead of "movie" is not a spelling mistake). Some burden falls upon you to proofread your writing, which brings me to my question:
It's been known to me for a while that simply "trying really hard" to detect problems doesn't work. I did hour long sessions of editing and proofreading my work, only to return to it the next day and still find small issues with it. Of course, errors happen and it's not unexpected that small mistakes will slip by in a large piece of work, but still, striving for perfection is not a bad thing. So my question is, what do you do about it? How do you bring you error count to the minimum?
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2013-02-25T07:38:48Z (over 11 years ago)
Original score: 8