Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A What is the best way forward for a first time author with little cash?

Once you publish something, it's out beyond your grasp. I strongly recommend against publishing a piece that you feel still has work to be done on. Self-publishing a novel that still needs editin...

posted 11y ago by Standback‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-12T20:06:02Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/8912
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T03:05:17Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/8912
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T03:05:17Z (about 5 years ago)
Once you publish something, it's out beyond your grasp. I strongly recommend against publishing a piece that you feel still has work to be done on.

Self-publishing a novel that still needs editing is not a wise stepping stone to feedback and constructive criticism.

- First of all, as an unpolished book, it's unlikely to receive much attention; good critics don't go hunting the web for utterly unknown fiction to analyse. 
- Secondly, the criticism you _do_ get is likely to be unhelpful - open a random page on Amazon or Goodreads for a book you've never heard of, and you'll see that the vast majority of comments basically boil down to "I liked this" or "I didn't like this"; detailed opinions on minor books are rare, whereas distilling useful advice from scads of snarky, snippety readers is a dangerous tactic. 
- Beyond all this, if you publish under your own name, a published book will remain associated with you and your career forever. It (and its sales ranks) will be the first thing publishers will look at on future projects. You don't want to mess that up with anything less than your best effort.

So I suggest a three-phase plan.

**1. Make it as good as you can on your own.** That means writing a first draft, revising until it's as good as you can make it, solving the problems that bother you, getting the manuscript into friendly format, making sure it's presentable and spellchecked and grammar-checked and anything else you can do pretty much on your own or with a little bit of help.

Now you're ready for **2. Get feedback from writers' workshops.** Now that you've polished the story as much as you can on your own, it's ready for it's first exposure. Writers' workshops, both physical and online, give you lots of opportunity to see how readers respond to your work. _Understanding_ this feedback is an art unto itself; in a nutshell, try to find reviewers who are actually in your target audience, have a thick skin (because people _will_ rip your work apart), and don't take any one criticism too seriously unless you're hearing it from more than one person. Here's our pages on [popular online workshops](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/904), and on [absorbing harsh critiques](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/385/how-do-i-recover-my-confidence-after-a-harsh-writing-group).

The great thing about writers' workshops is, you can iterate. Post in one place; get feedback; consider; revise - then, **repost,** in the same place or somewhere else. Once you start getting good reactions, you know that you're on the right track.

_Now_ is when you can **3. Find a great editor.** Editors cost a lot of money, so you only want to bring them in once you've done everything you can with all your other avenues. But a good one is more than worthwhile.

To find an editor, you've got to do your research. You want someone that you trust professionally, and you want somebody appropriate for your particular type of work. You'll look for recommendations (dig around well if you don't know them personally...), and you can also simply look for existing professionals who have done work you enjoy and respect. Once you find those people, they'll name their price. Don't try to skimp here, because someone who _isn't_ a good match - someone you're not sure of, or someone not good for your particular book - may be cheaper, but are much more likely to disappoint you entirely.

Finally, you'll want to assess the final product, and decide whether it's up to snuff and worth publishing. If not, [there's no shame in that](http://www.intergalacticmedicineshow.com/cgi-bin/mag.cgi?do=columns&vol=mette_ivie_harrison&article=017) - you'll have learned an immense amount by completing a novel, and your next effort will be better yet.

It's a hard long slog. But it's an incredible one. And we need good critics to be our guides, telling us how far we've come so far.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2013-09-15T18:01:57Z (over 11 years ago)
Original score: 7