Where to put counter-examples within a 5-paragraph essay?
I am tutoring some students in the very basics of writing a 5-paragraph essay to present an argument, in preparation for more advanced academic writing. I am instructing them to include:
- An introduction with thesis
- Three body paragraphs, each with statements that supporting the thesis and evidence
- A conclusion
Sometimes, the students want to present counter-arguments to their thesis. For example, they organized the five paragraphs like this:
- ¶1 thesis: Dogs make great pets.
- ¶2 statement: Dogs can make people happy. Examples.
- ¶3 statement: Dogs can rescue people. Examples.
- ¶4 statement: However, dogs are not clean. Examples.
- ¶5 conclusion.
Is it okay to include an entire paragraph based around a counter-example like this. What would be the appropriate place for such a counter-example to appear?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/9269. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
4 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
I am learning this in Language Arts right now. I am in sixth grade, and we are writing 5 paragraph argumentative essays. I believe the counterargument should be in the 4th paragraph, and then you give more pros that will outnumber the cons, so the reader is convinced.
We usually use three prongs, to make our writing more organized. So if you do it this way, you can introduce your third reason in your fourth paragraph, and THEN provide a counterargument.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/20973. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
In my humble opinion, it's a good idea in a persuasive essay to at least acknowledge counter-arguments. If you simply ignore counter-arguments, and a reader is aware of them, his response is likely to be, "Well, he just completely ignored the fact that X."
As Paul Clayton says, if you give the pro, then the con, then with no rebuttal or reply to the con you give your conclusion, it can make the argument look weak or disconnected. It can come across as, "Here is my argument, here is why my argument is flawed, but I'm just going to ignore the flaws and stick to my original thesis." When I am writing a persuasive essay, I don't end with counter-examples. I may end with counter-examples followed by rebuttals. More often, I start with the position I disagree with, then show why it's wrong, then give my conclusion. But there are many ways to structure an essay.
The shorter an essay the less time you're going to spend on rebuttals. In a 5-paragraph essay I might well skip rebuttals as there's just no time to get into them.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/9272. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
I think you need to remember that the five paragraph essay is not a normal literary form, it is an artificial training exercise (of dubious merit, if you ask me, but that is beside the point). Training exercises are designed to isolate certain aspects of an activity in order to focus on them in practice. (Like learning to drive standard by practicing in an empty parking lot rather than stalling your car on the public roads.)
As such, you set the rules to force students to practice the particular skill you are trying to train them for. If you are trying to train them to address counter arguments than that should be a required part of the drill. If you are trying to train them to marshal arguments in favor of a position, then it should not.
There is no right or wrong here except in regard to the specific skill you are trying to isolate and practice.
0 comment threads
It depends on what the "point" of the essay is, and how it's set up in the intro/thesis.
If the goal of the essay is to argue "dogs make great pets," then there shouldn't be a counter-argument at all.
If the goal is to present both sides of a point, then the intro needs to say that, and I would suggest Para 2 is the Pro, Para 3 is the Con, and maybe Para 4 discusses which is stronger or has more weight. At the moment your two-pro/one-con feels lopsided.
In any case, I would certainly put pro arguments before con arguments, so you're heading in the right direction.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads