Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on How can we revitalize our community?

Parent

How can we revitalize our community?

+9
−0

We've had low activity on our community for a while. Low activity means people visit less often, which means lower activity because they're not here asking and answering... iterate. We have ads active Somewhere Else, but without activity, people who follow them are unlikely to stick around.

We set up this community in a hurry early on, making the best decisions we could at the time. We've learned things since then. If we were starting today, I would argue against bulk data import and instead focus on new work and selective import of high-quality posts we're attached to from over there. I don't know if our large amount of imported content is part of the problem or orthogonal.

We had a great community elsewhere, and then the corporate shenanigans broke it and many people left, but we didn't succeed in picking up here where we left off.

What can we do to increase participation here and make our community more attractive to visitors? Should we reset -- delete most of the imported content (if it hasn't been edited), do some targeted recruiting, and try to start fresh? Or does our community, once broken, not recover?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+4
−3

Just a bystander here, but imported content is very off-putting. It basically says to visitors:

  • There is so little traffic that they have to copy stuff from elsewhere so you don't notice there're only crickets chirping here.
  • You're in the wrong place. The real content is Over There.
  • Answering an imported question is a waste of time since the asker isn't here and they'll never see it.
  • If you happened to bump into this place, you should definitely check out Over There, since that's where the content you're seeing came from in the first place.

Look around and see that the three sites that imported content are doing very poorly (Scientific Speculation, Writing, and Outdoors). They are in the bottom four ranked by recent activity.

the ability to import the content was one of the inducements for people (like me) who had created a lot of content at the other place

I faced the same issue moving to here from elsewhere. To get the new Electrical Engineering site going, I started with a few of my more popular answers at the other place. However, instead of just copying them, I used the opportunity to clean them up a bit, make the question more to the point, fix awkward wording, etc.

I also only did that to my own content. That way I didn't need to include any attribution. Attributions add clutter here, and invite people to go elsewhere.

When I started with one of my answers to someone else's question, I rewrote the question in my own words from the concept. That's useful anyway. Unlike the original questioner, I know what the answer is, and can ask the question better to be more generic, but also to target it better to the answer I want to write.

Here are some examples:

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)
General comments
Mark Baker‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Technically speaking, answering a question that the original asker won't see is still of value, since the point is (supposed to be) to create a permanent collection of answers that answer questions of value to many people. Whether that model actually works, or inspires people to write, is, of course open to question. But other than that, I agree with everything you say and it may be the clinching argument for getting rid of the imported content.

Mark Baker‭ wrote about 4 years ago

All that said, though, the ability to import the content was one of the inducements for people (like me) who had created a lot of content at the other place to come over here. Catch-22?

Neil‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

I was a mod on the other site, and I agree the imported content has a distinct feel of the sunk cost fallacy. Yeah, we put a lot of work into those questions and answers, but that was another time.

Trilarion‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

This answer is already a year old but just wanted to say thanks. It convinced me that pure copies have not much value (if any at all) and the only way is to improve existing knowledge content or presentation or concentrate on new content.