Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How do I explain a lack of sufficient data in my essay?

+0
−0

In the essay that I'm writing, I claim that women are more likely to be victims of abduction than are men. As evidence, I cite a study on child abduction (the NISMART, if you must know) stating that the majority of kidnapped children were females. Because abductions rarely happen, any data on abductions in general (child and adult), if it exists, is very difficult to find, even with a search in my college library's databases.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/14582. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

As this answer says, it's important to state your assumptions, whatever they are.

Sometimes there just isn't enough data, though, and I understand your question to be about what to do in that case. There are two basic approaches:

  • Only write about things you can back up. For example, Consumer Reports publishes ratings, including predicted reliability, of all new cars once a year. They list everything, but where they have insufficient data they just leave out the predicted reliability. That doesn't stop them from reporting other things about those cars or making recommendations. They're saying "we don't know this, but we can say these other things".

  • Be more liberal in what you write but be explicit about what data you're basing it on. You'll sometimes see news analyses of, say, crime patterns, with a note like "in 2011, the last year for which data is available, ..." -- well, it's 2015 now and 2011 data might not tell us enough, but it's the best they have so they extrapolate from it. In this approach you leave it to the reader to decide how much that matters.

In your essay, if you need to talk about abductions in general and you only have data for child abductions, you can take the latter approach. Say what you base your conclusions on, and perhaps you can anticipate and pre-emptively address arguments about why that data isn't representative.

The other approach is to focus your essay on what you can directly support with data, in this case writing about child abductions rather than all of them.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »