PhD thesis: how to visually separate the "general conclusion" chapter from the last part

I really don't think there is a reliable way to do this visually in the text simply because whatever visual cues announced to the reader that they have started Part II have long been forgotten before they get to the end of it. You can always do things like devoting an entire right page to "Part I", "Part II" and "Conclusion" but that is no guaranteed that the reader will recognize their significance when they encounter them so many hours apart.

Also, at the semantic level, it is unlikely that they are holding a hierarchical structure in their heads as they read. Even if we organize a long work hierarchically, this is more for our convenience than for the readers. It may help them get an initial sense of the work from the TOC, if they bother to read it, but when they are actually reading, the will read linearly. They will experience one thing after another, not one thing inside another.

If you want to make sure they they know they have arrived at the conclusion of the whole work, the most reliable way to do it is to announce it in the opening of the conclusion itself.

In Part I we looked at some topic. In Part II we looked at another topic. To sum up, some topic and another topic both lead us to the conclusion ...

And after all, this is the job of the conclusion, to remind the reader of the larger structural and logical unity of the argument, which they will likely have lost track of during the long read.

In short, don't rely on visual clues to guide the reader as to the structure of your text. Do it in the text itself.

posted over 8 years ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

Mark Baker‭

4371 reputation 12 1104 744 58

Although different fields will assuredly have variation in formats, doctoral candidates are expected to design their own research protocols and report them in a meaningful way. As such, I don't think there's a wrong answer per se as long as it doesn't put off your Primary Investigator or thesis committee.

You've already decided to give Part I and Part II their own title pages; you should consider staying consistent and give the Conclusion it's own title page in the same format. This is assuming your conclusion takes up a few pages.

However, I think I'd leave out the clever ideas and separate page from the bibliography.

Good luck.

posted about 8 years ago

CC BY-SA 3.0

Stu W‭

260 reputation 6 17 46 0

Each field has their own formatting habits, and each university/school/department their own. Most often, you number them separately so that you have:

1 Introduction

 1.1. Aims of the Research

 1.2 Theoretical Background and Primary Works
...
...
3. Aspects of Femininity in *Frankenstein*
 3.1 [a title]

And so on... The conclusion would be the last, before any appendixes (that's where your acronyms, bibliography, etc should be)

posted over 8 years ago

CC BY-SA 3.0

System‭

3226 reputation 147 215 553 0