Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Formatting used when introducing a term

+0
−0

I found a previous post about introducing terms, but it doesn't quite answer my question. I have a more specific question about the punctuation used when introducing a term, and not how to stylistically incorporate it into my writing.

I write a lot about art, and therefore use terms for "big concepts" that factor heavily into my content. For example, I am currently talking about "ethical relationality" and I am using it to talk about a certain artwork. The definition of these concepts are too bulky to simply fit into parentheses after the word, so need their own sentence or sometimes paragraph to be defined.

In the previous paragraph, I introduced both terms within quotation marks to show that they are special terms. Especially in the first one, both the words in the term are pretty mundane words that are used all the time, which is why I want to contain them within some sort of punctuation to show that I am using them in a special way.

Here are some ways I've seen in other writing... is one of them better, or more correct?

Donald suggests using ethical relationality as way to account for participants' different histories. Within the framework of ethical relationality...

or

Donald suggests using "ethical relationality" as way to account for participants' different histories. Within the framework of ethical relationality...

or

Donald suggests using ethical relationality as way to account for participants' different histories. Within the framework of ethical relationality...

Or maybe none of the above? Additionally, should I continue to format the word in a special way, or should I just use it like any other term once it's been introduced?

Thanks!

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/28096. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Either italics or quotes are fine to introduce the term; you could even bold the phrase if you're introducing many specialized concepts throughout your work. I wouldn't capitalize it or otherwise format it differently once you've defined it.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »