Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Checklist for making sure your writing is Atomic?

+1
−0

Question:

Can someone please give me a list of things to check when reviewing a document to make sure that it is atomic.

Atomic?

Meaning that anyone can start reading at any section in a document and not have other portions of the document be dependent on some other portion of the document. (Unless it is explicitly stated within the section they are reading, to read another section)

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/2087. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0
  • All terms are defined within the section.
  • Either no outside references or optional ones, or include the information so the reader doesn't have to reference anything.
  • Any background or history necessary to understand the material in the section is included.
  • If applicable, include a paragraph with predictions about the future of the material or potential uses.
  • Optionally, any potential controversies or questions regarding the material are at least acknowledged, if not necessarily debunked.

As a final check, compile your document with random sections, hand off to a beta reader, and ask the reader if anything led to a term which wasn't defined. Re-compile with different sections, lather, rinse, repeat.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »