Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A An alternative to saying 'users' when describing features

Talk to the user, rather than about the user. Unless "the User" is someone other than the person reading your work. I think users appreciate it more when it seems like the writer understands thei...

posted 13y ago by Orbital Bundle‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T01:31:04Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2661
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Orbital Bundle‭ · 2019-12-08T01:31:04Z (over 4 years ago)
Talk _to_ the user, rather than _about_ the user. Unless "the User" is someone other than the person reading your work.

I think users appreciate it more when it seems like the writer understands _their_ problems and wants to help them be successful.

There's also the possibility of confusion if you talk about "the user" -- with potential safety implications: Exactly _who_ is supposed to do _what, when?_

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2011-04-29T00:47:45Z (almost 13 years ago)
Original score: 0