Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

An alternative to saying 'users' when describing features

+1
−0

I'm creating some copy describing new web-app features for a number of different audiences (users, managers of sections of the site, owners of sub-sites which use our platform etc.).

I'm finding myself using 'users' constantly:

"Users will now be able to..."

"...opens up the creation of $feature to users..."

"...excited to see the creative ways our users will..."

I'm getting sick of the word. It feels ugly to me, and a bit jargony, and sort of unfriendly.

Any good alternatives?

In some cases I can replace 'users' with 'you'. But for two of these pieces, I'm addressing audiences who wont be using the features themselves, so the second person wont be appropriate.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/2474. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

3 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+1
−0

Talk to the user, rather than about the user. Unless "the User" is someone other than the person reading your work.

I think users appreciate it more when it seems like the writer understands their problems and wants to help them be successful.

There's also the possibility of confusion if you talk about "the user" -- with potential safety implications: Exactly who is supposed to do what, when?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2661. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

people

those using $feature

one (instead of "you")

we

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

When dealing with company people, I like to use colleague, associate, employee, coworker, etc. When dealing with customers, I like to say, customers, clients, vendors, prospective customer, etc.

For business writing, I feel it's very important to establish the relationship context of the interaction.

I might say something like this: "When a database administrator performs the nightly backup, the customer will either see delayed data or be alerted that the system is unavailable for maintenance. "

If it's a manual for the end user, I say "You": If you need to save at this point, click the "Save" on the upper right.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2716. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »