Third person story, containing a first person backstory
In several third person (usually limited) stories that I've read, there comes a time when one character shares some of their backstory to one or more other characters. This backstory is always (or almost always) shared with the reader in third person. I tend to find this irritating immersion breaking.
The story is in third person, but I always feel that a backstory told by one character about themselves to other characters would be in first person in the story, and therefore the writer should share this backstory as told by that character, not from the third person narrator.
Question: In a third person story, should a backstory told about a character, by that character be shared with the reader in the first person point of view that the character is giving it in, or would it be better for the author to stick with the previously established third person point of view that the rest of the story is told in?
Note: Please don't use any visual medias in your answers. I get why it would be a bad idea for them to tell a first person story.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/41267. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Are you changing narrators?
Think of your Third-Person story as being told by a single narrator. Now when you get to the back-story, does the character who is being talked about take over the narration or is it still the narrator? In most cases it would still be the narrator.
For instance, If I am telling you a story about some people that I know. As I introduce those people to you I may tell you some of their back story. Unless they come and personally deliver that backstory I am going to tell it to you in third person.
Most people don't change narrators during the story. In fact it is usually an omniscient nameless vehicle for delivering everything.
If you want to change POV you can. Rules are made to be broken. Just do it well. If you deliver a backstory in First Person give the reader a reason why the narrator changed.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/41269. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
For me, it depends on whether the backstory is completely true or not.
Swapping to first person (almost a monologue) permits the new story teller to lie. Holding it in third person makes it 'true'.
Changing narrator may not be common now, but has been used in the past (Bram Stoker, Wilkie Collins that I know of).
Fundamentally, whatever works for the story you are telling.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/41356. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
Who is telling this backstory?
Is it a separate section, set apart from the rest of the book? Or does the narrator tell the story?
It's fine to use first person for an entire novel, or for a piece of it, if it suits your purpose. One advantage to using both is that it's very clear to the reader that the narrative point of view has changed and there's no confusion over who is speaking. I've seen novels with multiple first person narrators and sometimes it takes a while to figure out who is who. That's something you want to avoid.
Sometimes sticking with third person (with or without a different narrator focus) is what works best. But if the original narrator uses third person for the regular story and then is also telling the backstory, stick with the third person for both.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads